Are the Bucs really an improved football team?

by Gary Shelton on August 17, 2015 · 2 comments

in general, NFL, Tampa Bay Bucs

For Smith, the first presason game wasn't all about Winston./Jeffrey S. King

For Smith, the first presason game wasn't all about Winston./Jeffrey S. King

Monday, 6 a.m.

The quarterback had a lousy rating. The offensive line had holes in it. The defense gave up points on three of the first drives of the night. The pass rush was invisible. The secondary was leaky.

Here's the question, then.

Are the Tampa Bay Bucs a significantly better football team than they were a year ago?

Of all the lingering questions surrounding the team's preseason opening loss to the Minnesota Vikings, that may be the most disturbing one. Granted, a lot of teams have clunker games in preseason. But are the Bucs really better? And if so, where?

Oh, they are better in some places, sure. The Bucs are deeper at defensive tackle. They should be better at safety. And, yes, the overall quarterback play should be better. But there are still shortcomings before this is no longer a cellar team.

In a way, all of the discussion of the progress of quarterback Jameis Winston is a misdirection play. Oh, he's vital to the team's improvement. If they're wrong about Winston, they're going to be bad for some time to come. The point is that the more we talk about Winston, the less we talk about other shortcomings. Hey, maybe that's part of a quarterback's job, too.

Content beyond this point is for members only.

Already a member? To view the rest of this column, sign in using the handy "Sign In" button located in the upper right corner of the blog (it's at the far right of the navigation bar under Gary's photo)!

Not a member? It's easy to subscribe so you can view the rest of this column and all other premium content on

Share with:Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Jim Willson August 18, 2015 at 12:12 am

I dont sense the kind of connection between Lovie and his team that we saw with Dungy and Chucky with their teams. He is monotone and the team seems monotone.
Am I wrong? (I hope) Also, whats with the super secret…I know but cant tell you stuff at press conferences?


Gary Shelton August 18, 2015 at 4:00 pm

Jim: Tony could be monotone as well, to the point of driving outsiders batty. Same message, always breaking things down and stressing fundamentals. Remember, we all tend to evaluate Tony for his complete package. But after that 6-10 first season, a lot of people still weren’t sold. Let’s see what happens from here. Obviously, Gruden came in with a burst of energy.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: